|
Home & News
Syllabus
Course documents
- Paper Repository
- Weekly Program
Online Documents
Paper Presentations
Projects
- Project Rules
|
Paper Presentations
See Rules
| # |
Date |
Name |
Paper |
Presentation |
Grader Name:
Grading scale
1: bad,
5: good
See Rules |
| A |
B |
C |
D |
go to top
Rules
Paper proposition.
Propose your paper by renaming the file as "FirstAuthorYear-Title-YourNameLastname.pdf".
For example the paper "Tracking evolving communities in large linked networks" written by John Hopcroft, Omar Khan, Brian Kulis, and Bart Selman, published by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA in 2004 proposed by Cafer Demir should be named as "Hopcroft2004-Tracking evolving communities in large linked networks-CaferDemir.pdf".
Presentation order. Presentation order is as given below.
Next 4 papers after the last presented paper should be ready for the next week. Please submit your presentation by naming as "nn.ppt" where nn is the presentation number. For example the powerpoint file of the second presentation should be named as "02.ppt".
Evaluation. Evaluation of the presentation is done in four categories (A, B, C, D) by grading in scale of 5 where 1 means bad, 5 means good.
Use this form for your evaluation.
Do not forget to write your name in the form.
| A |
Paper selection |
The paper selection measures the quality of the paper and relevance of the paper to the topics. |
| B |
Understanding of the Presenter |
Understanding of the Presenter measures the understanding of the material by the presenter, including the related topics.
For example if the paper talks about concepts such as "k-means clustering", "corpus" or "aphasia", the presenter should be able to explain what it is.
|
| C |
Presentation |
Presentation is the measurement of the quality of presentation. |
| D |
I understand |
I understand is a measure of how well the audience understands the material. |
|